Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aptiv PLC
How Aptiv PLC stacks up
APTV · against 204 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #49 of 205 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including APTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 16.6% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APTV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 2.4% | 4.9% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 207 reported | 23.9% | 8.7% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | 8.0% | 6.3% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 101.6% | 32.2% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APTV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 45 | 6.7B USD | 70 | 65 | |
| 45 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 70 | 55 | |
| 45 | 9.8B USD | 70 | 47 | |
| 45 | 62.0B DKK (≈$9.3B) | 70 | 55 | |
| 49 | 8.6B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 49 | 10.9B USD | 69 | 47 | |
| 49 | 4.4B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 49 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 69 | 70 | |
| 53 | 767.7B JPY (≈$5.2B) | 68 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score