Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aptiv PLC
How Aptiv PLC stacks up
APTV · against 206 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #113 of 207 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including APTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -77.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 28.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APTV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 207 reported | 28.7% | 5.9% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 178 reported | -77.2% | 6.3% | 2% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 206 reported | 2.1% | 6.2% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APTV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 109 | 1.67T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 57 | 62 | |
| 109 | 5.5B USD | 57 | 36 | |
| 111 | 5.0B USD | 56 | 58 | |
| 111 | 7.7B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 113 | 8.6B USD | 55 | 49 | |
| 113 | 5.5B USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 115 | 5.1B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 115 | 6.2B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 115 | 4.3B USD | 54 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score