Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
How Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. stacks up
APLE · against 148 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #103 of 149 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including APLE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.8% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APLE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APLE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 1.2% | 5.9% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 129 reported | -2.8% | 10.7% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 3.1% | 7.6% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APLE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 2 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 2 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.1B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 98 | 5.7B SGD (≈$4.3B) | 45 | 54 | |
| 98 | 5.4B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 46 | |
| 98 | 2.8B USD | 45 | 37 | |
| 102 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 44 | 26 | |
| 103 | 4.4B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 103 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 105 | 374.2B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 41 | 46 | |
| 105 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 41 | 58 | |
| 105 | 53.8B ZAR (≈$3.0B) | 41 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score