Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
APEI · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #493 of 802 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including APEI · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | APEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.49× | 0.44× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 1.41 | 0.32 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 3.25× | 1.53× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 489 | 4.4B CNY (≈$617M) | 39 | 23 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 490 |
| 138.6B INR (≈$1.7B) |
| 39 |
| 45 |
| 491 | 2.83T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 39 | 44 |
| 492 | 29.9B EUR (≈$32.9B) | 39 | 49 |
| 493 | 775M USD | 39 | 65 |
| 494 | 8.3B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 38 | 62 |
| 495 | 3.9B CNY (≈$543M) | 38 | 23 |
| 496 | Unavailable | 38 | 56 |
| 497 | 9.0B GBP (≈$11.8B) | 38 | 46 |