Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
How Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. stacks up
APAM · against 94 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 95 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including APAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.8% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 103 reported | 9.8% | 11.2% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 10.2% | 12.3% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | 10.0% | 11.9% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1.4B USD | 95 | ||
| 4 | 3.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 230.3B INR (≈$2.8B) | 92 | ||
| 48 | 58.3B THB (≈$1.6B) | 54 | 49 | |
| 50 | 323.2B INR (≈$3.9B) | 52 | 58 | |
| 51 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 52 | 588.9B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 53 | 2.7B USD | 49 | 63 | |
| 53 | 4.5B USD | 49 | 21 | |
| 53 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 58 | |
| 56 | 4.9B USD | 48 | 38 | |
| 57 | 2.2B USD | 47 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score