Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
How Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited stacks up
AOSL · against 501 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #384 of 502 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including AOSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on assets: -4.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 83% of peers. Operating margin: -6.4% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on invested capital: -5.5% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AOSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AOSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 474 reported | -5.5% | 7.4% | 22% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 501 reported | -6.4% | 6.9% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | -4.4% | 3.4% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 465 reported | -5.2% | 9.2% | 23% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 505 reported | 22.3% | 51.0% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AOSL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.84T USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 95.8B USD | 99 | 67 | |
| 1 | 598.2B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 15.6B USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 379 | 736M USD | 17 | 28 | |
| 379 | 24.0B USD | 17 | 30 | |
| 379 | 3.1B USD | 17 | 25 | |
| 384 | 5.4B USD | 16 | 39 | |
| 384 | 671M USD | 16 | 31 | |
| 384 | 274M USD | 16 | 27 | |
| 384 | 2.3B USD | 16 | 40 | |
| 384 | 593M USD | 16 | 25 | |
| 384 | 684M USD | 16 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score