Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ANL · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #220 of 1,373 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including ANL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ANL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.12× | 0.24× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.10 | 0.53 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 9.55× | 2.62× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 216 | 6.0B USD | 84 | ||
| 217 | 170M USD | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 35 |
| 218 | 1.4B HKD (≈$180M) | 84 | 61 |
| 219 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 84 | 69 |
| 220 | 617M USD | 84 | 28 |
| 221 | 100M CHF (≈$115M) | 84 |
| 222 | 67M USD | 84 |
| 223 | 78.6B JPY (≈$535M) | 84 | 74 |
| 224 | 4.0B CNY (≈$554M) | 84 | 71 |