Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
How Abercrombie & Fitch Co. stacks up
ANF · against 239 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 240 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ANF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.5% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ANF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ANF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 240 reported | 4.7% | 5.7% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 208 reported | 12.0% | 6.6% | 59% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 239 reported | 11.5% | 6.0% | 70% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ANF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 96 | 181.9B ZAR (≈$10.0B) | 65 | 53 | |
| 96 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 49 | |
| 101 | 35.3B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 64 | 57 | |
| 101 | 581.4B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 101 | 6.7B USD | 64 | 65 | |
| 101 | 8.0B USD | 64 | 48 | |
| 101 | 6.2B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 64 | 49 | |
| 106 | 23.9B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 63 | 70 | |
| 106 | 4.2B USD | 63 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score