Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ANAB · against 459 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #403 of 460 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ANAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ANAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 436 reported | 25.47× | 0.22× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 432 reported | 0.45 | 0.50 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 447 reported | 5.61× | 2.84× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 399 | 1.1B CAD (≈$774M) | 14 | 53 | |
| 400 | 1.3B USD | 14 | 15 | |
| 401 | 7.0B CNY (≈$977M) | 14 | 39 | |
| 402 | 1.5B USD | 14 | 53 | |
| 403 | 1.4B USD | 14 | 73 | |
| 404 | 1.2B USD | 14 | ||
| 405 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 14 | 51 | |
| 406 | 6.9B CNY (≈$967M) | 13 | 46 | |
| 407 | 7.0B SAR (≈$1.9B) | 13 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score