Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AN · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,340 of 1,585 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 15
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 5.02× | 0.50× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.81 | 0.56 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 0.78× | 1.48× | 14% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,336 | 4.6B GBP (≈$6.0B) | 16 | 42 | |
| 1,337 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 14.5B USD |
| 16 |
| 29 |
| 1,338 | 3.3B CNY (≈$456M) | 16 | 23 |
| 1,339 | 24M AUD (≈$16M) | 16 | 19 |
| 1,340 | 5.9B USD | 15 | 49 |
| 1,341 | 422M GBP (≈$548M) | 15 | 52 |
| 1,342 | 8.7B USD | 15 | 59 |
| 1,343 | 3.4B CNY (≈$474M) | 15 | 45 |
| 1,344 | 84.3B USD | 15 | 53 |