Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMZN · against 1 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #1 of 2 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including AMZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AMZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | 4.8% | 2.5% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | 5.8% | 3.2% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | -0.1% | 0.1% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | 19.7% | 12.8% | 100% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.80T USD | 32 | 58 | |
| 2 | 1.49T USD | 11 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score