Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMZN · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #181 of 362 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)47 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including AMZN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMZN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 320 reported | 0.46× | 1.02× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 349 reported | 1.46 | 1.14 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 1.03× | 1.47× | 26% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 492M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 128M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 314M USD | 95 | 88 | |
| 5 | 269M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 177 | 5.9B USD | 28 | 67 | |
| 178 | 5.0B USD | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 43 |
| 179 | 1.4B USD | 27 | 19 |
| 180 | 15.8B USD | 27 | 55 |
| 181 | 2.80T USD | 27 | 58 |
| 182 | 8.3B USD | 27 | 68 |
| 183 | 8.0B USD | 26 | 49 |
| 184 | 1.0B USD | 26 | 56 |
| 185 | 2.7B USD | 26 | 46 |