Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
How América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. stacks up
AMX · against 17 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
73/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #6 of 18 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including AMX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 83.0% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 18 reported | 8.6% | 5.5% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 83.0% | 4.1% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 18 reported | 3.8% | 4.3% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 2 | 82.5B USD | 97 | 70 | |
| 3 | 9.39T JPY (≈$63.9B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 4 | 36.3B CHF (≈$41.7B) | 82 | 52 | |
| 4 | 123.4B USD | 82 | 58 | |
| 6 | 73.9B USD | 73 | 58 | |
| 7 | 146.6B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 8 | 74.4B USD | 57 | 75 | |
| 9 | 11.24T JPY (≈$76.4B) | 56 | 46 | |
| 10 | 67.0B SGD (≈$50.9B) | 50 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score