Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amentum Holdings, Inc.
How Amentum Holdings, Inc. stacks up
AMTM · against 445 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #125 of 446 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score69 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including AMTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 3.7% | 4.3% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 450 reported | 11.3% | 7.9% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 8.7% | 4.1% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 85.9% | 40.3% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 120 | 816.2B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 70 | 72 | |
| 120 | 462.2B JPY (≈$3.1B) | 70 | 66 | |
| 120 | 36.6B NOK (≈$3.5B) | 70 | 57 | |
| 125 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 69 | 80 | |
| 125 | 5.5B USD | 69 | 63 | |
| 125 | 5.3B SGD (≈$4.0B) | 69 | 57 | |
| 125 | 89.0B SEK (≈$8.9B) | 69 | 48 | |
| 125 | 28.8B NOK (≈$2.7B) | 69 | ||
| 130 | 22.5B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 68 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score