Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to American Tower Corporation
How American Tower Corporation stacks up
AMT · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #99 of 176 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including AMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 3.9% | 2.9% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 5.1% | 6.1% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 4.5% | 5.9% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 4.3% | 63.5% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 95 | 2.7B USD | 44 | 39 | |
| 95 | 7.5B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 95 | 15.2B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 95 | 19.6B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 99 | 87.3B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 99 | 24.6B USD | 43 | 42 | |
| 99 | 3.4B USD | 43 | 69 | |
| 102 | 5.6B USD | 42 | 56 | |
| 102 | 4.5B USD | 42 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score