Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amrize Ltd
How Amrize Ltd stacks up
AMRZ · against 80 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #47 of 81 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including AMRZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.0% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMRZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMRZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 5.0% | 8.5% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 68 reported | 7.0% | 30.8% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 3.3% | 2.2% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMRZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 16.0B CAD (≈$11.7B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 44 | 57.3B MYR (≈$12.6B) | 59 | 66 | |
| 44 | 36.9B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 46 | 15.8B USD | 58 | 40 | |
| 47 | 54.2B SAR (≈$14.6B) | 55 | 77 | |
| 47 | 23.0B USD | 55 | 54 | |
| 47 | 2.34T INR (≈$28.0B) | 55 | 61 | |
| 47 | 123.5B BRL (≈$22.2B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 51 | 13.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 52 | 224.6B CNY (≈$31.4B) | 51 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score