Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
How Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. stacks up
AMBP · against 364 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #312 of 365 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score28 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including AMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 80% of peers. Return on assets: 0.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 63% of peers. Operating margin: 4.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AMBP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 344 reported | 5.2% | 9.5% | 25% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 364 reported | 4.4% | 8.7% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 346 reported | 0.2% | 4.2% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 330 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 368 reported | 12.3% | 32.0% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AMBP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 393.5B INR (≈$4.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 307 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 29 | 33 | |
| 307 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 307 | 3.2B USD | 29 | 46 | |
| 307 | 4.0B USD | 29 | 36 | |
| 312 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 43 | |
| 312 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 28 | 24 | |
| 312 | 2.0B USD | 28 | 27 | |
| 315 | 2.59T KRW (≈$1.9B) | 27 | 41 | |
| 315 | 252.6B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 27 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score