Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMBP · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #155 of 356 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AMBP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AMBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 1.7% | 4.3% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 11.4% | 8.4% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 11.0% | 5.3% | 81% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | -28.1% | 35.8% | 5% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 148 | 593M USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 148 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 148 | 5.2B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 155 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 155 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 155 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 155 | 8.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 155 | 474M USD | 50 | 30 | |
| 155 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score