Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMAT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,033 of 1,698 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including AMAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.29× | 0.26× | 47% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.59 | 0.84 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.42× | 1.83× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,029 | 4.9B CNY (≈$679M) | 39 | 46 | |
| 1,030 | 750.6B INR (≈$9.0B) | 39 | 54 | |
| 1,031 | 2.3B CNY (≈$328M) | 39 | 13 | |
| 1,032 | 20.2B NOK (≈$1.9B) | 39 | 56 | |
| 1,033 | 303.1B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 1,034 | 6.1B CNY (≈$850M) | 39 | 15 | |
| 1,035 | 11.1B AUD (≈$7.3B) | 39 | 53 | |
| 1,036 | 1.5B USD | 39 | 56 | |
| 1,037 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 39 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score