Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMAT · against 27 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #12 of 28 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including AMAT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AMAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 25 reported | 0.29× | 0.29× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 27 reported | 1.59 | 1.44 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 28 reported | 2.42× | 1.95× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421.5B USD | 93 | 78 | |
| 2 | 185.0B USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 3 | 164.9B USD | 78 | 89 | |
| 4 | 216.3B USD | 75 | 64 | |
| 5 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 8 | 265.8B USD | 50 | 68 | |
| 9 | 214.3B USD | 47 | 62 | |
| 10 | 250.5B USD | 44 | 43 | |
| 11 | 286.5B USD | 43 | 39 | |
| 12 | 303.1B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 13 | 155.8B USD | 37 | 63 | |
| 14 | 154.6B USD | 36 | 58 | |
| 15 | 288.7B USD | 35 | 63 | |
| 16 | 598.2B USD | 34 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score