Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Antero Midstream Corporation
How Antero Midstream Corporation stacks up
AM · against 77 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 78 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -10.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 6.9% | 4.1% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 71 reported | -10.6% | 1.9% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 77 reported | 7.6% | 0.7% | 68% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 5 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 33 | 6.7B USD | 70 | 56 | |
| 34 | 54.3B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 35 | 6.8B EUR (≈$7.5B) | 66 | 75 | |
| 36 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 64 | 43 | |
| 37 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 38 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 51 | |
| 38 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 60 | 43 | |
| 40 | 7.40T CLP (≈$8.1B) | 59 | 43 | |
| 41 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score