Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alexander's, Inc.
How Alexander's, Inc. stacks up
ALX · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #250 of 663 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score67 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ALX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 5.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.8% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 13.8% | 5.3% | 85% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.4% | 5.3% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 3.7% | 6.8% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 18.2% | 112.8% | 5% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 243 | 1.2B SGD (≈$928M) | 63 | 74 | |
| 243 | 32.6B SEK (≈$3.3B) | 63 | 55 | |
| 250 | 2.6B HKD (≈$333M) | 62 | 63 | |
| 250 | 167.8B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 63 | |
| 250 | 1.2B USD | 62 | 69 | |
| 250 | 4.4B GBP (≈$5.7B) | 62 | 56 | |
| 250 | 10.7B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 60 | |
| 250 | 1.5B AUD (≈$1.0B) | 62 | 50 | |
| 256 | 13.0B TWD (≈$403M) | 61 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score