Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
How Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ALRM · against 422 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #255 of 423 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ALRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -7.2% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 426 reported | 8.7% | 10.8% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 285 reported | -7.2% | 10.0% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 421 reported | 7.3% | 6.3% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALRM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 250 | 22.4B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 46 | 47 | |
| 250 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 255 | 35.9B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 255 | 161.3B TWD (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 57 | |
| 255 | 3.2B USD | 45 | 67 | |
| 255 | 4.2B USD | 45 | 54 | |
| 255 | 5.2B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 255 | 4.0B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 261 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 44 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score