Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Allient Inc.
How Allient Inc. stacks up
ALNT · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #926 of 1,667 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ALNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.9% | 2.3% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 4.6% | 4.3% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.8% | 2.7% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 20.9% | 33.4% | 31% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 926 | 29.8B JPY (≈$203M) | 44 | 66 | |
| 926 | 109.4B JPY (≈$744M) | 44 | 40 | |
| 926 | 44.6B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 926 | 15.9B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 44 | 54 | |
| 926 | 1.5B USD | 44 | 54 | |
| 926 | 2.3B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 44 | 41 | |
| 926 | 3.9B USD | 44 | 76 | |
| 926 | 4.4B USD | 44 | 62 | |
| 926 | 1.4B USD | 44 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score