Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALMS · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #175 of 1,373 · scores higher than 87% of peers · safety percentile 87
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including ALMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ALMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.08× | 0.24× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | -0.79 | 0.53 | 99% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 6.74× | 2.62× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 171 | 5.4B CNY (≈$751M) | 88 | 71 | |
| 172 | 314M USD | 88 | 56 | |
| 173 | 9.0B USD | 87 | 78 | |
| 174 | 301M USD | 87 | ||
| 175 | 841M USD | 87 | 33 | |
| 176 | 22.7B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 87 | 75 | |
| 177 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 87 | 51 | |
| 178 | 3.2B MYR (≈$710M) | 87 | 65 | |
| 179 | 1.1B USD | 87 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score