Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALMS · against 503 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #76 of 504 · scores higher than 85% of peers · safety percentile 87
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)61 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including ALMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ALMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 471 reported | 0.08× | 0.18× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 479 reported | -0.79 | 0.43 | 99% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 496 reported | 6.74× | 2.80× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 72 | 6.0B CNY (≈$841M) | 88 | 29 | |
| 73 | 5.1B CNY (≈$719M) | 88 | 74 | |
| 74 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 88 | 34 | |
| 75 | 5.4B CNY (≈$751M) | 88 | 71 | |
| 76 | 841M USD | 87 | 33 | |
| 77 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 87 | 51 | |
| 78 | 3.2B MYR (≈$710M) | 87 | 65 | |
| 79 | 1.1B USD | 87 | 26 | |
| 80 | 156.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 87 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score