Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALKS · against 190 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #126 of 191 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including ALKS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ALKS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 185 reported | 0.87× | 0.31× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 193 reported | 0.27 | 0.58 | 71% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 182 reported | 2.30× | 2.68× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 5 | 4.6B USD | 98 | 29 | |
| 122 | 4.0B USD | 35 | 56 | |
| 123 | 74.2B SEK (≈$7.4B) | 35 | 55 | |
| 124 | 5.2B CHF (≈$5.9B) | 35 | 69 | |
| 125 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 34 | 56 | |
| 126 | 7.7B USD | 34 | 37 | |
| 127 | 47.8B HKD (≈$6.1B) | 34 | 60 | |
| 128 | 45.1B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 33 | 53 | |
| 129 | 9.2B USD | 33 | 39 | |
| 130 | 5.1B USD | 32 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score