Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ALGM · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,243 of 1,667 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ALGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | ALGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 0.2% | 2.3% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 2.1% | 4.3% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.4% | 2.7% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 15.4% | 33.4% | 21% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,243 | 2.0B CNY (≈$275M) | 25 | 57 | |
| 1,243 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 16.4B TWD (≈$507M) |
| 25 |
| 30 |
| 1,243 | 5.4B CNY (≈$754M) | 25 | 34 |
| 1,243 | 7.7B SAR (≈$2.1B) | 25 | 32 |
| 1,243 | 6.3B USD | 25 | 47 |
| 1,243 | 671M USD | 25 | 31 |
| 1,243 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 25 | 31 |
| 1,243 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 35 |
| 1,243 | 35.4B NOK (≈$3.4B) | 25 | 50 |