Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alamo Group Inc.
How Alamo Group Inc. stacks up
ALG · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #755 of 2,394 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ALG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.3% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 5.6% | 3.8% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 10.8% | 7.0% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 6.0% | 3.7% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 66.9% | 50.5% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 755 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 68 | 62 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score