Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acadia Realty Trust
How Acadia Realty Trust stacks up
AKR · against 172 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #34 of 173 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including AKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AKR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 173 reported | 4.7% | 4.9% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 143 reported | -47.4% | 6.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 168 reported | 6.7% | 5.3% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AKR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 3 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 3 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 5 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 29 | 24.2B SEK (≈$2.4B) | 84 | 56 | |
| 29 | 1.5B USD | 84 | 47 | |
| 32 | 1.4B CHF (≈$1.6B) | 83 | 70 | |
| 32 | 2.9B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 34 | 2.8B USD | 82 | 68 | |
| 34 | 7.1B CAD (≈$5.2B) | 82 | 37 | |
| 36 | 1.5B USD | 81 | 64 | |
| 36 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 81 | 66 | |
| 38 | 21.5B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 80 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score