Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Akamai Technologies, Inc.
How Akamai Technologies, Inc. stacks up
AKAM · against 197 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #156 of 198 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AKAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.4% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AKAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AKAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 200 reported | 5.9% | 14.4% | 20% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 163 reported | -3.4% | 19.0% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 197 reported | 5.7% | 10.3% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AKAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 1 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 1 | 13.3B USD | 98 | 50 | |
| 5 | 9.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 152 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.6B) | 44 | 69 | |
| 153 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 154 | 271.0B TWD (≈$8.4B) | 42 | 59 | |
| 154 | 84.2B CNY (≈$11.8B) | 42 | 43 | |
| 156 | 12.4B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 156 | 9.8B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 158 | 229.5B TWD (≈$7.1B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 158 | 387.7B TWD (≈$12.0B) | 40 | 54 | |
| 158 | 18.7B USD | 40 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score