Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
How Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. stacks up
AJG · against 354 other Financial Services companies
Profitability
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #209 of 355 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score36 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including AJG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 18.3% vs peer median 23.5%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.3% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AJG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AJG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 353 reported | 6.3% | 6.3% | 50% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 209 reported | 18.3% | 23.5% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 382 reported | 1.9% | 2.6% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 374 reported | 6.7% | 9.5% | 39% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 433 reported | 43.2% | 80.0% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AJG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.05T INR (≈$12.6B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1.49T INR (≈$17.9B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 566.9B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 205 | 742M USD | 42 | 39 | |
| 205 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score