Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AAR Corp.
How AAR Corp. stacks up
AIR · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #191 of 473 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score89 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including AIR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AIR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AIR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 4.5% | 3.0% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 7.0% | 6.3% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 0.8% | 3.3% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 40.4% | 32.3% | 59% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AIR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 182 | 268M USD | 49 | 65 | |
| 182 | 441M USD | 49 | 45 | |
| 182 | 10.2B USD | 49 | 55 | |
| 182 | 3.5B USD | 49 | 23 | |
| 191 | 4.4B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 191 | 921M USD | 48 | 39 | |
| 191 | 5.8B USD | 48 | 72 | |
| 191 | 22.1B USD | 48 | 49 | |
| 191 | 4.0B USD | 48 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score