Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AGRO · against 820 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #621 of 821 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score82 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including AGRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | AGRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 761 reported | 2.6% | 7.7% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 817 reported | 6.6% | 7.6% | 45% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 784 reported | -0.2% | 4.0% | 16% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 770 reported | 3.7% | 8.3% | 29% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 824 reported | 25.9% | 32.0% | 35% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 229.1B INR (≈$2.7B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 4.0B MYR (≈$881M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 621 | 3.0B CNY (≈$426M) | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 21 |
| 621 | 29.1B JPY (≈$198M) | 24 | 51 |
| 621 | 437M MYR (≈$96M) | 24 | 22 |
| 621 | 3.3B CNY (≈$465M) | 24 | 32 |
| 621 | 1.4B USD | 24 | 22 |
| 621 | 18.2B USD | 24 | 43 |
| 621 | 1.4B USD | 24 | 33 |
| 621 | 3.3B THB (≈$91M) | 24 | 40 |
| 629 | 50.0B JPY (≈$340M) | 23 | 44 |