Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AGNT · against 266 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #224 of 267 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)30 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AGNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AGNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 264 reported | Not reported | 0.83× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 265 reported | 2.06 | 0.59 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 267 reported | 1.51× | 1.44× | 52% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1.1B SGD (≈$864M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.3B SAR (≈$901M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 5 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 98 | 50 | |
| 220 | 3.2B HKD (≈$415M) | 19 | 29 | |
| 221 | 905M USD | 18 | 19 | |
| 222 | 681M USD | 18 | 52 | |
| 223 | 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) | 18 | 47 | |
| 224 | 655M USD | 17 | 23 | |
| 225 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 21 | |
| 226 | 480M USD | 17 | 42 | |
| 227 | 3.2B HKD (≈$406M) | 17 | 11 | |
| 228 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score