Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to First Majestic Silver Corp.
How First Majestic Silver Corp. stacks up
AG · against 1,274 other Basic Materials companies
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #33 of 1,275 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score134 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 26.3% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 124.3% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,289 reported | 124.3% | 3.4% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 826 reported | Not reported | 9.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,263 reported | 26.3% | -0.0% | 93% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 1.4B CAD (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 19 | 108.51T IDR (≈$6.7B) | 98 | 42 | |
| 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score