Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AFYA · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #276 of 802 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including AFYA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AFYA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.63× | 0.44× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.37 | 0.32 | 43% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.20× | 1.53× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 272 | 436M USD | 66 | 24 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 273 |
| 43.0B JPY (≈$292M) |
| 66 |
| 74 |
| 274 | 41.8B CNY (≈$5.8B) | 66 | 50 |
| 275 | 4.0B MYR (≈$870M) | 66 | 67 |
| 276 | 933M USD | 66 | 84 |
| 277 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 66 | 62 |
| 278 | 89.8B JPY (≈$610M) | 65 | 75 |
| 279 | 151.9B CLP (≈$167M) | 65 | 47 |
| 280 | 4.2B CNY (≈$584M) | 65 | 61 |