Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Affirm Holdings, Inc.
How Affirm Holdings, Inc. stacks up
AFRM · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 154 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AFRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 81% of peers. Revenue growth: 32.2% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 39.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 3556.8% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AFRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AFRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 32.2% | 10.5% | 76% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 3556.8% | 11.4% | 100% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 39.0% | 11.5% | 91% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AFRM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 6 | 249M USD | 96 | 31 | |
| 7 | 24.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 8 | 3.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 8 | 18.9B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 10 | 461M USD | 93 | 59 | |
| 11 | 4.4B USD | 92 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score