Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AFG · against 851 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #304 of 852 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score82 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | AFG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 930 reported | -0.2% | 8.7% | 18% | Context only | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 829 reported | 25.4% | 16.0% | 64% | 100% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 905 reported | 3.4% | 8.3% | 24% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 95 | 91 | |
| 1 | 689M HKD (≈$88M) | 95 | 90 | |
| 1 | 34.9B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 95 | ||
| 1 | 28.2B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 95 | 50 | |
| 1 | 166M MYR (≈$36M) | 95 | 82 | |
| 295 | 61.4B USD | 65 | 66 | |
| 304 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13.5B HKD (≈$1.7B) |
| 64 |
| 61 |
| 304 | 360.9B SAR (≈$97.4B) | 64 | 57 |
| 304 | 379.7B HKD (≈$48.6B) | 64 | 78 |
| 304 | 12.7B USD | 64 | 59 |
| 304 | 140.0B USD | 64 | 62 |
| 304 | 105.8B USD | 64 | 46 |
| 304 | 787M USD | 64 | 60 |
| 304 | 33.4B EUR (≈$36.8B) | 64 | 58 |