Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AEVA · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,266 of 1,698 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including AEVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AEVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 3.72× | 0.26× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 2.41 | 0.84 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 7.85× | 1.83× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,262 | 284M EUR (≈$313M) | 26 | 51 | |
| 1,263 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) |
| 26 |
| 22 |
| 1,264 | 532M USD | 26 | 25 |
| 1,265 | 65.0B JPY (≈$442M) | 26 | 58 |
| 1,266 | 623M USD | 25 | 32 |
| 1,266 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 33 |
| 1,268 | 8.1B THB (≈$226M) | 25 | 53 |
| 1,269 | 12.0B JPY (≈$81M) | 25 | 46 |
| 1,270 | 2.2B CNY (≈$304M) | 25 | 30 |