Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AES · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #346 of 360 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including AES · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 2.57× | 1.21× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.95 | 0.40 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.75× | 1.05× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 342 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 5 | 16 | |
| 343 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 463M EUR (≈$510M) |
| 5 |
| 33 |
| 344 | 32.7B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 4 | 29 |
| 345 | 6.1B CNY (≈$854M) | 4 | 16 |
| 346 | 10.6B USD | 4 | 54 |
| 347 | 9.1B USD | 4 | 52 |
| 348 | 13.6B USD | 3 | 57 |
| 349 | 11.0B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 3 | 11 |
| 350 | 13.6B NOK (≈$1.3B) | 3 | 17 |