Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AES · against 75 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #71 of 76 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including AES · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 76 reported | 2.57× | 1.31× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 75 reported | 0.95 | 0.46 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 72 reported | 0.75× | 0.97× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 | |
| 2 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 89 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 86 | 55 | |
| 4 | 5.4B USD | 84 | 77 | |
| 5 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 81 | 73 | |
| 67 | 14.7B USD | 10 | 27 | |
| 68 | 9.8B GBP (≈$12.8B) | 9 | 29 | |
| 69 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 8 | 61 | |
| 70 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 6 | 61 | |
| 71 | 10.6B USD | 4 | 54 | |
| 72 | 9.1B USD | 4 | 52 | |
| 73 | 13.6B USD | 3 | 57 | |
| 74 | 20.2B USD | 2 | 40 | |
| 75 | 17.1B USD | 1 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score