Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The AES Corporation
How The AES Corporation stacks up
AES · against 89 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #9 of 90 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.3% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 73% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 102.6% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 8.5% | 7.4% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 102.6% | 2.8% | 91% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | 0.3% | 4.0% | 23% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 6 | 15.4B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2.2B USD | 95 | 48 | |
| 8 | 5.9B USD | 93 | 73 | |
| 9 | 10.6B USD | 92 | 54 | |
| 9 | 584M USD | 92 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 42 | |
| 11 | 5.8B USD | 91 | 41 | |
| 13 | 5.2B USD | 90 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score