Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AEP · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #281 of 360 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including AEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 1.61× | 1.21× | 30% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.47 | 0.40 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.50× | 1.05× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 277 | 1.1B USD | 23 | 20 | |
| 278 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.8B USD |
| 23 |
| 41 |
| 279 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 23 | 69 |
| 280 | 11.4B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 22 | 39 |
| 281 | 70.7B USD | 22 | 40 |
| 282 | 29.1B USD | 22 | 48 |
| 283 | 14.9B AUD (≈$9.9B) | 21 | 52 |
| 284 | 75.6B INR (≈$907M) | 21 | 39 |
| 285 | 6.3B USD | 21 | 38 |