Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ameren Corporation
How Ameren Corporation stacks up
AEE · against 50 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #20 of 51 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including AEE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 2.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 24.3% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AEE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AEE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 51 reported | 3.8% | 6.9% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 24.3% | 2.5% | 85% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | 2.3% | 3.0% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AEE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 2 | 15.4B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 3 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 91 | 58 | |
| 4 | 896.4B THB (≈$25.1B) | 90 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2.21T INR (≈$26.5B) | 89 | 45 | |
| 16 | 19.4B EUR (≈$21.4B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 17 | 29.4B USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 17 | 36.3B USD | 67 | 51 | |
| 17 | 17.1B USD | 67 | 19 | |
| 20 | 30.6B USD | 66 | 47 | |
| 21 | 27.9B USD | 65 | 41 | |
| 21 | 27.3B USD | 65 | 39 | |
| 23 | 23.3B USD | 64 | 78 | |
| 23 | 28.0B USD | 64 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score