Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ADM · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #444 of 799 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ADM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
| Metric | ADM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 5.2% | 4.5% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 7.0% | 8.9% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 4.9% | 6.3% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 69.3% | 54.4% | 61% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 444 | 231.3B TWD (≈$7.2B) | 44 | 35 | |
| 444 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 32.4B CNY (≈$4.5B) |
| 44 |
| 56 |
| 444 | 15.5B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 44 | 47 |
| 444 | 808M AUD (≈$533M) | 44 | 62 |
| 444 | 34.0B USD | 44 | 39 |
| 444 | 650M USD | 44 | 55 |
| 444 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 71 |
| 444 | 2.2B USD | 44 | 22 |
| 452 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 43 | 45 |