Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ADI Global Distribution Inc
How ADI Global Distribution Inc stacks up
ADIG · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #576 of 1,667 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ADIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -18.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 81% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADIG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -18.7% | 2.3% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 10.2% | 4.3% | 81% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | Not reported | 2.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 175.4% | 33.4% | 97% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADIG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 576 | 279.1B JPY (≈$1.9B) | 65 | 65 | |
| 576 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score