Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ACM Research, Inc.
How ACM Research, Inc. stacks up
ACMR · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #642 of 1,708 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including ACMR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 8.8% vs peer median 6.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on assets: 4.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 73% of peers. Operating margin: 13.3% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACMR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | 8.8% | 6.8% | 57% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 13.3% | 6.3% | 73% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | 4.4% | 2.9% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | 11.6% | 7.5% | 63% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 43.8% | 33.4% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACMR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 642 | 55.9B JPY (≈$380M) | 62 | 76 | |
| 642 | 4.77T JPY (≈$32.5B) | 62 | 62 | |
| 642 | 410.6B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 62 | 61 | |
| 642 | 32.3B TWD (≈$1.0B) | 62 | 58 | |
| 642 | 3.2B USD | 62 | 64 | |
| 642 | 343M EUR (≈$378M) | 62 | 64 | |
| 642 | 629M AUD (≈$415M) | 62 | 57 | |
| 642 | 989M EUR (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 54 | |
| 642 | 312M ILS (≈$84M) | 62 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score