Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AECOM
How AECOM stacks up
ACM · against 357 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
19/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #332 of 358 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including ACM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 19?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -51.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: -4.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 359 reported | -4.2% | 7.0% | 8% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 319 reported | -51.7% | 9.8% | 6% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 3.3% | 6.8% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 327 | 10.2B USD | 22 | 28 | |
| 330 | 5.6B USD | 21 | 47 | |
| 331 | 8.5B USD | 20 | 21 | |
| 332 | 2.05T JPY (≈$13.9B) | 19 | 45 | |
| 332 | 8.5B USD | 19 | 31 | |
| 332 | 27.7B BRL (≈$5.0B) | 19 | 38 | |
| 332 | 11.6B USD | 19 | 20 | |
| 336 | 640.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 18 | 48 | |
| 336 | 6.4B USD | 18 | 17 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score