Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Albertsons Companies, Inc.
How Albertsons Companies, Inc. stacks up
ACI · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #253 of 799 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ACI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 4.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.8% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 16.2% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 1.3% | 4.5% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 16.0% | 8.9% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 8.8% | 6.3% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 24.9% | 54.4% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 253 | 2.44T JPY (≈$16.6B) | 68 | 46 | |
| 253 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score